Quote Originally Posted by Justin Tolerable View Post
It's funny when people talk, for example, about improving the men's England team by limiting the number of foreign players in the Premier League. The answer, from people who don't like the suggestion (the Premier League and its clubs, UEFA, and others), always cry that this is against employment laws and freedom of movement/employment in the EU... while apparently not caring (or noticing) the rampant, discriminatory and flagrantly ILLEGAL apartheid and segregation of males and females!!! Um, doesn't that break any of those aforementioned laws and human rights? Isn't there a huge elephant in the stadium and in UEFA HQ that no one can see or are intentionally ignoring? This is the greatest hypocrisy. The same thing applies to limiting players' earnings: again this is against UK and EU employment laws is the cry from people who don't like the suggestion... but isn't gender apartheid more so???
I'm sure that there are good reasons - for example physicality. What about if a man goes in for a tackle and he makes contact with her chest? That could open up so many cans of worms.
What about the differences in size, strength, muscular make up etc?

Quote Originally Posted by Justin Tolerable View Post
Why don't we ban all women from politics, too? Or can they have a separate parliament?
A little bit extreme here.... not really sure of the link

Quote Originally Posted by Justin Tolerable View Post
Why hasn't the 'main' Manchester United team ever in its history employed a female manager or female first-team player? The only answer is surely that they hate females. What would happen if they also discriminated against black male players? Why is one discrimination and not the other?
You did mention that you were off your medication, maybe you should call someone from your care team and tell them and then take the meds as prescribed.